The statement released by Buckingham Palace clarifies that while the King’s regular schedule of treatments has already begun, doctors have advised him to postpone any public-facing duties for the time being. However, it is emphasized that he will continue to carry out state business and official paperwork as usual. Despite the unexpected news, the King remains positive and is grateful for the swift intervention of his medical team. It is noted that this intervention was made possible due to his recent hospital procedure.

In a show of transparency and to avoid any speculation, King Charles has personally chosen to share his diagnosis with the public. He hopes that by doing so, it may provide a better understanding and support for those around the world who are also battling cancer. Despite the setback, the King is determined to return to his full public duties as soon as possible and is grateful for the support and understanding of his people during this time.

The post King Charles III Diagnosed With Cancer, Receiving Treatment appeared first on Jewish Directory.

Netanyahu stressed that the war cannot be brought to an end prematurely and that it will require a significant amount of time, estimated to be months rather than years. Turning to the issue of hostages, the prime minister stated that efforts are still being made to secure their release. However, he also acknowledged that Hamas has made demands that are unacceptable and cannot be met.

In fact, Netanyahu asserted that the release of hostages must follow a similar agreement as before and that it cannot be achieved at any cost. This firm stance highlights the prime minister’s unwavering determination to protect the safety and well-being of his country and its citizens.

The post Netanyahu: “We Will Kill Hamas Leaders, It Will Take Months, Not Years” appeared first on Jewish Directory.

Despite facing immediate opposition from various Republicans in both the House and Senate, with the latter even announcing that there will be no vote on the matter, bipartisan negotiators are working tirelessly to sell this package as a last-ditch effort to secure necessary funding for Ukraine’s defense against Russian aggression.

This deal presents a prime opportunity for Congress to finally make significant changes to the flawed US immigration system, as highlighted by the additional provisions for military aid to Israel, funding for allies in the Asia-Pacific region, and humanitarian assistance for refugees escaping Gaza. While President Joe Biden has played a crucial role in securing this deal by collaborating with leaders from both sides of the aisle in the Senate, its passage through Congress remains a challenging task, if not an impossible one. This sentiment is echoed by many Republican Senators, who have expressed concerns about the border policies not going far enough and have questioned the allocation of additional aid to Ukraine. In fact, Senator Marco Rubio of Florida went as far as to categorize this deal as ‘an easy NO.’

The package has also drawn strong opposition from former President Donald Trump, who is the likely Republican nominee for the upcoming presidential election. It is worth noting that there may also be some opposition from Democratic Senators, as Senator Alex Padilla of California has publicly stated his disapproval of the changes that this deal would bring to the asylum process, stating that it ‘misses the mark.’

Despite these challenges, here is what we know about the package so far: it includes $60 billion for Ukraine and $14 billion for Israel, as well as investments in domestic defense manufacturing, aid for humanitarian efforts, and measures to control the influx of migrants at the US-Mexico border. Additionally, $10 billion will be allocated to humanitarian efforts in other regions, including Ukraine, Israel, and Gaza. Lastly, $20 billion will be set aside for immigration enforcement measures.

The proposed package includes a provision to allocate $20 billion towards strengthening immigration enforcement, which would result in a significant increase in the hiring of officers to handle and assess asylum claims. It would also see a substantial boost in the number of Border Patrol agents and initiatives implemented to combat the illegal import of fentanyl. Of particular note is the proposed changes to the asylum process, which would involve stricter standards and prompter enforcement measures. The purpose of the asylum system is to provide protection to individuals who are fleeing persecution based on factors such as race, religion, political affiliation, or membership in a marginalized group.

While this is an essential part of international law and serves to safeguard human rights, the system has become overwhelmed in recent years due to a surge in the number of people seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border. Under the new plan, individuals would be required to demonstrate a strong likelihood of being granted asylum during initial screenings. Additionally, those with a criminal history, who have already been resettled in another country, or who could have found safety by resettling in their home country would not be eligible to make an asylum claim.

Furthermore, if migrants cross the border illegally between ports of entry, they would be detained and undergo a screening within a maximum of 15 days. If they pass the screening, they would receive a work permit, be placed in a supervision program, and have their asylum case decided within three months. For those who seek asylum in between ports of entry, detention would be mandatory while they await the initial screening for their claim. To accommodate this, there would be a significant expansion in detention facilities. The proposal also involves a substantial expansion of an existing program under the Biden administration, which monitors families who arrive at the border and awaits screening for their asylum claim.

This program was developed as an alternative to detention for families and its expansion would provide another avenue to handle the increasing numbers of families seeking asylum.

Immigration advocates are voicing their concerns and opposition to the proposed changes to the asylum policy, citing various reasons for their opposition. One of the main concerns is that the current standard for granting asylum is intentionally set low, as most migrants seeking asylum are in extremely dire situations, lack proper legal representation, and are still recovering from the traumatic experiences of their journeys. The proposed changes also aim to restrict the ability of migrants to apply for asylum at all, if the number of illegal border crossings reaches a specific threshold. This echoes a policy implemented by former President Donald Trump, known as Title 42, which justified the swift expulsion of migrants in the name of curbing the spread of COVID-19.

Under the new proposal, if Customs and Border Protection encounters 4,000 migrants per day over a five-day average, the government would have the authority to immediately expel them. Once the number of encounters reaches 5,000, automatic expulsions would take place. This is especially concerning as there were days in December where border encounters topped 10,000 – the highest on record for illegal crossings. However, the proposal does still allow migrants to apply for asylum at designated ports of entry. Additionally, if the number of illegal crossings decreases by 75%, the administration would have a two-week window to terminate the use of this emergency power.

Supporters of Title 42 argue that it was a necessary tool in expelling migrants quickly, freeing up resources for patrolling and protecting the border. However, critics question the effectiveness of this policy, as it is difficult to determine accurate numbers when migrants repeatedly attempt to cross the border after being expelled under Title 42. Critics also point out that this policy has enabled criminal organizations to exploit and prey on the buildup of migrants in the southern border region.

The proposal does make allowances for migrants who express concerns about being persecuted if they are returned to Mexico, allowing them to still apply for asylum in that specific scenario. Furthermore, the proposed legislation aims to set limits on the President’s immigration authority by placing restrictions on the use of emergency powers in situations like this. Overall, there are many concerns and debates around the proposed changes to the asylum policy and the potential consequences it may have on migrants and border security.

The proposed legislation would greatly impact the way presidential administrations handle immigration at the U.S. border. Specifically, it would place strict limitations on the use of ‘parole’ to allow migrants into the country. This would mean eliminating the current practice of granting parole to those who have crossed the border illegally or presented themselves at ports of entry, and instead implementing a new system for evaluating asylum claims. While the Biden administration would still have the authority to schedule screenings of asylum claims through an app, the use of humanitarian parole – which allows individuals fleeing unrest or war to enter the country – would be preserved but subject to negotiation.

Of concern for progressive and Hispanic Democrats is the potential harm to migrants seeking asylum under this new legislation. However, the bill does include measures aimed at assisting migrants already in the U.S. and the cities and states where they have settled. This includes providing $1.4 billion to local programs, such as shelters, that have seen an influx of migrants, as well as expediting work permits for those awaiting an asylum claim.

In addition to these provisions, the legislation addresses other pressing issues related to immigration, such as the trafficking of fentanyl into the U.S. It would authorize sanctions and anti-money laundering tools to combat this criminal activity. Furthermore, the bill would also create a yearly visa allocation of 50,000 for employment and family-based immigration over the next five years.

However, it should be noted that the legislation does not address broader immigration reforms or deportation protections for individuals living in the U.S. without authorization – key elements of previous Senate deals. Still, the bill does offer a pathway to residency for Afghans who worked alongside U.S. soldiers during America’s longest war. This is in response to the nearly 76,000 Afghans who have arrived in the U.S. on military planes after the withdrawal of American troops in August 2021. All in all, the proposed legislation seeks to make significant changes to the way presidential administrations handle immigration, while also addressing specific issues and providing support to those directly affected by the immigration process.

The newly proposed provision aims to create a pathway for qualified Afghans to not only apply for, but also obtain, U.S. citizenship. This would not only give deserving individuals the opportunity to become permanent members of American society, but also provide them with a sense of security and stability in the aftermath of their evacuation. To ensure the safety of both the applicants and the country, thorough vetting and screening procedures will be put in place before granting lawful permanent resident status to eligible evacuees. This will not only maintain the integrity of the U.S. immigration process, but also prioritize the safety and well-being of all individuals involved. Ultimately, this provision seeks to recognize and honor the sacrifices made by these brave Afghans and grant them the opportunity to build a brighter future for themselves and their families in the United States.

The post What’s In The Bipartisan Senate Package To Aid Ukraine And Israel, Secure U.S. Border appeared first on Jewish Directory.

The post US Tracking Of Virus Variants Has Improved After Slow Start appeared first on Jewish Directory.

The incident happened on Tuesday afternoon when the homeowner received a call from the bank that there are suspicious charges on the credit card, after checking, they noticed the card and pocketbook missing.

The homeowners immediately called Shomrim and the NYPD, and after a quick investigation they realized it was the employee who was in the home just moments before.

A quick call to National Grid revealed the location of the suspect, the NYPD and Shomrim located the employee and returned the items to the rightful owner. The suspect was placed under arrest.

The Company told BoroPark24, “National Grid has zero tolerance for unethical and illegal behavior. The alleged act and arrest of one of our vendor’s employees, if true, is reprehensible. The safety and security of our customers and communities are paramount, and we take these matters seriously and are suspending work with the vendor until an investigation is completed.”

The post Vendor Working for National Grid Robs Home appeared first on Jewish Directory.

The convictions for Greg McMichael, son Travis McMichael and neighbor William “Roddie” Bryan came after jurors deliberated for about 10 hours. The men face minimum sentences of life in prison. It is up to the judge to decide whether that comes with or without the possibility of parole.

The McMichaels grabbed guns and jumped in a pickup truck to pursue the 25-year-old Black man after seeing him running in their neighborhood outside the Georgia port city of Brunswick in February 2020. Bryan joined the pursuit in his own pickup and recorded cellphone video of Travis McMichael fatally shooting Arbery.

Arbery’s killing after the graphic video leaked online two months later. Though prosecutors did not argue that racism motivated the killing, federal authorities have charged them with hate crimes, alleging that they chased and killed Arbery because he was Black. That case is scheduled to go to trial in February.

The jury sent a note to Superior Court Judge Timothy Walmsley soon after returning to court Wednesday morning asking to view two versions of the shooting video — the original and one that investigators enhanced to reduce shadows — three times apiece.

Jurors returned to the courtroom to see the videos and listen again the 911 call one of the defendants made from the bed of a pickup truck about 30 seconds before the shooting.

The disproportionately white jury received the case around midday Tuesday and spent about six hours deliberating before adjourning without a verdict.

The McMichaels told police they suspected Arbery was a fleeing burglar when they armed themselves and jumped in a pickup truck to chase him. Bryan joined the pursuit when they passed his house and recorded cellphone video of Travis McMichael blasting Arbery at close range with a shotgun as Arbery threw punches and grabbed for the weapon.

On the 911 call the jury reviewed, Greg McMichael tells an operator: “I’m out here in Satilla Shores. There’s a Black male running down the street.”

He then starts shouting, apparently as Arbery is running toward the McMichael’s idling truck with Bryan’s truck coming up behind him: “Stop right there! Damn it, stop! Travis!” Gunshots can be heard a few second later.

The graphic video death leaked online two months later, and the Georgia Bureau of Investigation took over the case, quickly arresting the three men. Each of them is charged with murder and other crimes.

Defense attorneys contend the McMichaels were attempting a legal citizen’s arrest when they set off after Arbery, seeking to detain and question him as a suspected burglar after he was seen running from a nearby home under construction.

Travis McMichael testified that he shot Arbery in self-defense, saying the running man turned and attacked with his fists while running past the idling truck where Travis McMichael stood with his shotgun.

Prosecutors said there was no evidence Arbery had committed crimes in the defendants’ neighborhood. He had enrolled at a technical college and was preparing at the time to study to become an electrician like his uncles.

The post 3 White Men Charged in Ahmaud Arbery Case Found Guilty of Murder appeared first on Jewish Directory.

The government will also warn companies not to involve themselves in “human rights violations” in Yehudah and Shomron and will exclude the area along with east Jerusalem in any agreement reached with Israel.

Deputy Foreign Minister Idan Roll, who is currently in Belgium for a visit, immediately canceled all his scheduled meetings with the Belgian Foreign Ministry and Parliament.

“The Belgian government’s decision to label products from Judea & Samaria strengthens extremists, does not help promote peace in the region, and shows Belgium as not contributing to regional stability,” he stated.

The post Belgium To Label Products From Shomron, Israel Cancels Meetings appeared first on Jewish Directory.

Notorious Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib found herself backtracking in a recent interview on her own policy stances after being called out for supporting a bill that would have abolished all prisons within 10 years.

Asked by Axios reporter Jonathan Swan about her support for the BREATHE Act, which calls for the Justice Department and the Department of Health and Human Services to create a roadmap for the “full decarceration of federal detention facilities within 10 years” and “a moratorium on all new federal prison, jail, immigrant and youth detention construction,” Tlaib found herself in an unenviable position.

The post Video: Rep. Rashida Tlaib defends her bill to empty out federal prisons of all inmates appeared first on Jewish Directory.

The country recently emerged from a fourth COVID wave, and daily infections have been relatively low for the last few weeks. But Health Ministry statistics show that a large share of the new infections have been in children and teenagers.

Children age 5 to 11 make up nearly half of active cases. Officials hope the new inoculation campaign will help bring down the numbers and perhaps stave off a new wave.

Israeli media reported low demand for the shots on the first day they were available to this age group. Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett was expected to accompany his son David, 9, later Tuesday to get his jab in a bid to encourage parents to have their children vaccinated.

Israel, which has a population of more than 9 million, has had more than 1.3 million infections since the start of the pandemic and more than 8,100 deaths

The post Israel Begins Giving COVID Shots To Children Age 5 To 11 appeared first on Jewish Directory.

After the attacks, a large number of police forces, together with investigators, entered the neighborhood in order to check the security cameras for the identity of the wrongdoers, and recover the civilian’s car.

Violent conflicts then broke out between the residents and police, with the residents throwing stones and other objects at the officers, and the police using clubs to control the crowd.

The post Violent Conflicts In Mea Shearim After Police Officer & Civilian Attacked: Watch appeared first on Jewish Directory.